Template talk:Bullpup firearms
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Groups?
[edit]Any chance someone could sort these into groups? A single big group makes it difficult to navigate these, which if after all the point of the template. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
the Bushmaster M17s should be moved into carbines because as semi auto only it does not qualify as an assault rifle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.210.229 (talk) 21:02, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Regrouping suggestion
[edit]I propose doing away with the "Assault rifles" and "Battle rifles" groups and meld them into one "Rifles" group since the distinguishing criteria to both of those categories are still debatable and because not all bullpups are of the select-fire, "military-kind". Maybe even the "Carbines" group can be fused in.
If no reply or further input is made to this topic in the next week or so, I will likely go ahead with the above idea. 2601:5:C480:88E0:DAA2:5EFF:FE96:5BB8 (talk) 11:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)